I know, I know, this post should have been about the solution I found to my
"can't underline text in an input button" problem, but a realization hit me just now and I had to write about it.
YOU might be wondering about the title, "A truly impossible task". You're probably thinking, "Whatever could he mean? International peace? Solving world hunger?" Actually, I'm referring to everyone's search for the "perfect" operating system (OS).
IN today's economy, rising prices and not-so-rising incomes put a huge strain on people to budget and prioritize what they purchase. At the top of everyone's list is the essentials necessary to survive, relative to today's standards of living: food, shelter, and utilities (gas, water, electricity). After that, the list changes from person to person, but I think we can all agree that operating systems are towards the bottom of "the list".
AS it stands, its not like OS's come out everyday. The big two operating systems that 99% of computers users use, Microsoft's Windows and Apple's Mac OS, have fallen into a fairly predictable time table for releasing a new operating system. Apple, for example, releases a new "whole number" OS about once every four to five years, with incremental version (x.1, x.2, x.3, etc...) releases averaging out to one a year[1]. Microsoft releases a new operating system at an approximate ratio of one OS to every three years[2]. With such long times between major OS released, operating systems are not (nor should they be) a priority on ANYONE's personal "gotta buy to live" shopping list.
SUCH as it happens, though, during the advertisement-created anticipation of a new operating system's release (Microsoft's Windows Vista, for example), loyal Windows users find themselves staring in disbelief at Microsoft's estimated retail price of their newest creation. At the time of this writing, I can't find any numerical data to back up my claim that Vista will cost an arm and a leg, but my gut tells me that if Microsoft feels justified, it'll jack up the prices to compensate for all of the "features" we'll see in the new operating system (this is, of course, NOT taking into account the facts that Microsoft's new filesystem and one of the "Three Pillars" of Longhorn, titled WinFS,
will never see the light of day[3],
PC-to-PC synchronization has been cut, and the new scripting shell, code-named Monad, was
deemed too risky and a security violation[5]).
WITH all of these cuts Microsoft has made to get Windows Vista out of the door and into the market in a timely manner, computer users have been wondering if their hard earned money would be well-invested in the next generation of Windows. Recent doubt about Vista has created an opening for Linux enthusiasts, and the various flavors of Linux have received consideration because of their improved usability and their very attractive price: free.
I suppose part of this article has roots from my recent experience with the Linux operating system
Ubuntu. My experience wasn't all that bad, but it was no where near as easy or hassle-free to use as Windows is. For comparison, When I do a fresh install of Windows, it usually takes me about 1-2 hours to get Service Pack 2 and subsequent updates installed, my firewall and anti-virus set up and updated, install better video drivers, and install all the other miscellaneous software I use on a daily basis, games included. I can get Windows set up and ready to go in that short a period of time because I know what I'm doing and I've had 6 installs before this one to get everything sorted out and restored. It took me a good three to four hours with Ubuntu to get it
somewhat near what I felt would be a "normal" status. I will give Ubuntu, this though: right out of the box, this operating system offers a perfect combination of software that would be suitable for anyone doing mundane word processing, spreadsheeting, internet browsing, and e-mail sending. If I didn't play PC games, relied on some Windows-Only software, or had the time to learn a new OS, I would have made the switch sooner.
A big deal has been made about Linux's
XGL interface; to be honest, after getting it working on Ubuntu, its just a whole lot of Eye-candy that can't mask the myriad Terminal commands one must execute to install software or even make changes to the list of start-up programs. For an operating system that wants to be as an alternative to Windows, it needs to work on removing Linux's Terminal as a requirement to do anything. And I want it to be known that I don't believe for a minute that XGL is in direct competition with Vista's new
Aero interface. Sure, it may look nice and wobbly, but when it comes down to it, only one will be on greater than 90% of computers starting early next year.
NO matter what tech site you look at or forum you browse, you'll most likely find one or two or ten people singing the praises of a Linux-based OS; you'll also find ten times, if not a HUNDRED times, that many people arguing for Windows' superiority (I'm sorry to say I neglected Mac OS because I personally have very little to no experience with Apple-based technology). The truth of the matter is, each side of the OS triangle (Windows, Mac OS, and Linux) has its own Pro's and Con's, and there will never be that perfect OS that will have the market share and software selection of Windows, the adaptability and free price of Linux, and the multimedia capabilities of Mac OS. In my opinion, computers were designed to give people choice, and as long as an economy is present and markets exist to sell to, operating system manufacturers will be competing against each other until computers become obsolete. Until that time, I say go with what you're comfortable with; if you can't have everything, get most of what you want!
P.S. I haven't done a long piece of writing like this in a long time, so let me know what you think of not only my message, but my writing style too, please!
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS
[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows
[3]
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,2180,1640454,00.asp
[4]
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,2180,1973620,00.asp
[5]
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122145,00.asp